Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

A Training Program for Defendants With Intellectual Disabilities Who Are Found Incompetent to Stand Trial

Barry W. Wall and Paul P. Christopher
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2012, 40 (3) 366-373;
Barry W. Wall
Dr. Wall is Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, and Director, Forensic Service, Eleanor Slater Hospital, Department of Behavioral Health, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals, RI. Dr. Christopher is Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul P. Christopher
Dr. Wall is Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, and Director, Forensic Service, Eleanor Slater Hospital, Department of Behavioral Health, Developmental Disabilities and Hospitals, RI. Dr. Christopher is Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Demographic, Legal, and Psychiatric Characteristics by Treatment Group

    Slater Method Mean (SD or %)nTraditional Method Mean (SD or %)n
    Age*30.17 (9.65)1838.58 (8.38)12
    Highest grade completed9.38 (2.69)137.83 (3.66)6
    Intelligence quotient (total)57.47 (8.52)1563.83 (4.66)6
    Number of previous charges0.86 (1.17)14.40 (0.52)10
    Baseline CAST-MR total score50.13 (10.30)838.50 (6.36)2
    Female3 (16.7%)183 (25.0%)12
    Single15 (83.3%)10 (83.3%)
    Race/ethnicity1812
        Caucasian10 (52.9%)8 (66.7%)
        Hispanic5 (29.4%)2 (16.7%)
        African American3 (17.6%)1 (8.3%)
        Asian0 (0%)1 (8.3%)
    Employed4 (23.52%)172 (18.2%)11
    Prior special education11 (61.1%)187 (57.1%)7
    Language barrier4 (22.2%)182 (16.7%)12
    DDD eligibility15 (83.3%)128 (62.5%)8
    DDD refusal2 (12.5%)102 (16.7%)9
    Primary psychiatric diagnosis1812
        Depressive disorder0 (0%)1 (8.3%)
        Bipolar1 (5.6%)0 (0%)
        Schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder5 (27.8%)2 (16.7%)
    Age, y30.17 (9.65)1838.58 (8.38)12
        Impulse control disorder1 (5.6%)2 (16.7%)
        Adjustment1 (5.6%)2 (16.7%)
        None8 (44.4%)4 (33.3%)
    Substance abuse history9 (52.9%)182 (18.2%)12
    • DDD, Division of Developmental Disabilities.

    • ↵* p < .005.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Trial Competence Attainment Rates by Group

    Slater Method (n = 18)Traditional Method (n = 12)
    Attained11 (61.1%)2 (16.7%)
    Not attained5 (27.8%)9 (75%)
    Deemed nonattainable2 (11.1%)1 (8.3%)
    • Original number of episodes of care, 36.

    • Episodes excluded due to repeat episodes, 5.

    • Other episodes excluded (one individual died during training), 1.

    • Episodes assessed for trial competence attainment, 30.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 40 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 40, Issue 3
1 Sep 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Training Program for Defendants With Intellectual Disabilities Who Are Found Incompetent to Stand Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
A Training Program for Defendants With Intellectual Disabilities Who Are Found Incompetent to Stand Trial
Barry W. Wall, Paul P. Christopher
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2012, 40 (3) 366-373;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
A Training Program for Defendants With Intellectual Disabilities Who Are Found Incompetent to Stand Trial
Barry W. Wall, Paul P. Christopher
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2012, 40 (3) 366-373;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Benefits of Correctional Psychiatry Teaching and Clinical Exposure for Third-Year Medical Students
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law