Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Articles

Segmented Versus Traditional Crisis Intervention Team Training

Gary S. Cuddeback, Robert A. Kurtz, Amy Blank Wilson, Tonya VanDeinse and Stacey E. Burgin
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2016, 44 (3) 338-343;
Gary S. Cuddeback
Dr. Wilson is an assistant professor. Dr. Cuddeback is an associate professor. Ms. VanDeinse is a doctoral candidate, and Ms. Burgin is a research associate, School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Dr. Kurtz is Program Manager, Justice System Team, Community Policy Management Section, Division of MH/DD/SAS, Raleigh, NC.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert A. Kurtz
Dr. Wilson is an assistant professor. Dr. Cuddeback is an associate professor. Ms. VanDeinse is a doctoral candidate, and Ms. Burgin is a research associate, School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Dr. Kurtz is Program Manager, Justice System Team, Community Policy Management Section, Division of MH/DD/SAS, Raleigh, NC.
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Blank Wilson
Dr. Wilson is an assistant professor. Dr. Cuddeback is an associate professor. Ms. VanDeinse is a doctoral candidate, and Ms. Burgin is a research associate, School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Dr. Kurtz is Program Manager, Justice System Team, Community Policy Management Section, Division of MH/DD/SAS, Raleigh, NC.
PhD, LSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tonya VanDeinse
Dr. Wilson is an assistant professor. Dr. Cuddeback is an associate professor. Ms. VanDeinse is a doctoral candidate, and Ms. Burgin is a research associate, School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Dr. Kurtz is Program Manager, Justice System Team, Community Policy Management Section, Division of MH/DD/SAS, Raleigh, NC.
MSW
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stacey E. Burgin
Dr. Wilson is an assistant professor. Dr. Cuddeback is an associate professor. Ms. VanDeinse is a doctoral candidate, and Ms. Burgin is a research associate, School of Social Work, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC. Dr. Kurtz is Program Manager, Justice System Team, Community Policy Management Section, Division of MH/DD/SAS, Raleigh, NC.
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Participant Characteristics, Knowledge, Attitudes

    CharacteristicTraditional (n = 47)Segmented (n = 32)
    Male, n (%)37 (78.72)28 (87.50)
    Race, n (%)
        White31 (65.96)18 (56.25)
        African American/Other16 (34.04)14 (43.75)
    Age (M ± SD)37.45 ± 10.5438.44 ± 7.77
    Marital status, n (%)
        Married***36 (76.60)15 (46.88)
        Single11 (23.40)17 (53.13)
    Education, n (%)
        Less than high school3 (6.38)2 (6.25)
        High school8 (17.02)11 (34.38)
        Some college20 (42.55)12 (37.50)
        College degree12 (25.53)5 (15.63)
        Graduate school4 (8.51)2 (6.25)
    Law enforcement experience and agency size, n (M ± SD)
        Police officers in agency*95.32 ± 104.0037.22 ± 19.22
        Years of experience9.59 ± 7.8311.09 ± 6.20
    Mental health encounters, n (M ± SD)
        Prior month4.93 ± 8.667.38 ± 17.84
        Prior 6 months25.77 ± 45.1432.06 ± 105.75
        Family/friend with mental illness (Y/N)26 (55.32)19 (59.38)
    Scale scores (M ± SD)
        Knowledge
            Before training10.96 ± 1.7310.53 ± 1.87
            After training12.17 ± 1.58*11.94 ± 1.78*
        Dangerousness
            Before training34.30 ± 7.3436.59 ± 8.98
            After training34.70 ± 9.1836.23 ± 6.68
    Social distance
            Before training16.64 ± 4.0118.26 ± 3.43
            After training18.87 ± 3.96*19.52 ± 4.52
    MHASP
            Before training112.77 ± 15.47118.74 ± 13.10
            Before training111.27 ± 20.35117.00 ± 13.89
    CIT experiences
        Volunteered for CIT training (Y/N)**30 (63.83)10 (31.25)
        CIT training satisfaction (M ± SD)28.20 ± 7.0628.43 ± 6.23
    • Data were missing for race for one observation. Data were missing for one respondent for family/friend with mental illness.

    • ↵* p < .05;

    • ↵** p < .01;

    • ↵*** p < .001.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 44 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 44, Issue 3
1 Sep 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Segmented Versus Traditional Crisis Intervention Team Training
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Segmented Versus Traditional Crisis Intervention Team Training
Gary S. Cuddeback, Robert A. Kurtz, Amy Blank Wilson, Tonya VanDeinse, Stacey E. Burgin
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2016, 44 (3) 338-343;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Segmented Versus Traditional Crisis Intervention Team Training
Gary S. Cuddeback, Robert A. Kurtz, Amy Blank Wilson, Tonya VanDeinse, Stacey E. Burgin
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2016, 44 (3) 338-343;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Legal and Ethics Considerations in Capacity Evaluation for Medical Aid in Dying
  • Mental Health Aftercare Availability for Juvenile Justice-Involved Youth in New York City
  • Attitudes of Forensic Fellowship Psychiatry Directors towards an Applicant Match
Show more Regular Articles

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law