Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherLegal Digest

Admissibility of Hearsay Statements in the Direct Examination of an Expert Witness

Wei Hu and Paul Noroian
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2019, 47 (3) 371-372; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.3878L3-19
Wei Hu
Law and Psychiatry Program Department of Psychiatry University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, Massachusetts
MD, PhD
Roles: Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Noroian
Law and Psychiatry Program Department of Psychiatry University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester, Massachusetts
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 47 no. 3 371-372
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.3878L3-19

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online August 29, 2019.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2019 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Wei Hu, MD, PhD, Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry and
  2. Paul Noroian, MD
  1. Law and Psychiatry Program
    Department of Psychiatry
    University of Massachusetts Medical School
    Worcester, Massachusetts

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 47 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 47, Issue 3
1 Sep 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Admissibility of Hearsay Statements in the Direct Examination of an Expert Witness
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Admissibility of Hearsay Statements in the Direct Examination of an Expert Witness
Wei Hu, Paul Noroian
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2019, 47 (3) 371-372; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.3878L3-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Admissibility of Hearsay Statements in the Direct Examination of an Expert Witness
Wei Hu, Paul Noroian
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2019, 47 (3) 371-372; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.3878L3-19
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Upheld Trial Court Decision Not to Permit Defense Expert Witness to Testify on Direct Examination About Defendant's Hearsay Statements
    • Ruling and Reasoning
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • New Mental Health Evidence in Federal Habeas Proceedings
  • The Use of Medical Records in Life Insurance Litigation
  • Addressing Mental States in Expert Witness Testimony
Show more Legal Digest

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law