Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
LetterLetters

LETTERS

Liza Gold
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2020, 48 (1) 142; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003928-20
Liza Gold
Washington, DC
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Editor:

I commend Drs. Wall and Aoun for their excellent discussion, “Diversity and Inclusion Within AAPL.”1 They note the approval of new Council positions to represent minority/underrepresented groups and women, as well as the formation of a Diversity Committee. I would add that in 2014, Women of AAPL (WAAPL) had its first meeting and continues to thrive. More recently, in 2018, the Council also approved the formation of a Women's Committee to help foster gender equity within AAPL. Auspiciously, this committee had its first meeting at the 2019 Annual Meeting in Baltimore, which celebrated the 50th anniversary of AAPL.

Drs. Wall and Aoun correctly note that diversity data are hard to come by, and they opine that diversity and inclusion within the context of APPL “is truly a problem with the pipeline of forensic psychiatrists being trained by programs across the nation” (Ref. 1, p 276). Yet attributing lack of gender diversity to pipeline problems is a persistent misconception that obscures the fact that the pipeline itself reflects institutionalized gender biases that systematically and routinely disadvantage women.

Despite the fact that women now comprise half of incoming medical students in the United States, “large gaps in salary and leadership positions remain” (Ref. 2, p 1). Many women physicians find they must make choices that limit either career or personal goals. This creates further disadvantages in income, career achievement, and the ability to attain leadership positions, and so perpetuates the pipeline problem.

Substantial gender disparity in work status emerges immediately following medical training.2 Regardless of specialty, women physicians are significantly more likely than men to report not working full-time. In this study, a 9.6 percent gender gap in full-time employment was present in the first year after training and grew to 38.7 percent by six years after training. Overall, 77.5 percent of women physicians in this study currently working part time or not at all cited family as the factor that influenced their employment status decision.

Frank and colleagues2 concluded that this gender disparity “may contribute” to later gender inequities in compensation and promotion. Indeed, women physicians who work part time or take leave early in their careers for family reasons often fall out of the pipeline. Women have made up 40 to 50 percent of U.S. medical students over the past 25 years. Nevertheless, women account for only 16 percent of all deans and department chairs, 10 percent of senior authorship, and 7 percent of editors-in-chief at prestigious medical journals.3

The pipeline is also affected by sexual harassment and gender discrimination. In a recent study,4 over 50 percent of women reported experiencing sexual harassment or gender discrimination in medical training and academic medicine. The study also found that common responses to such experiences include leaving institutions, changing specialties, or changing careers. Any of these outcomes can be a significant disadvantage reflected in financial disparities and career advancement, and of course, in the pipeline.

I agree with Drs. Wall and Aoun that the lack of diversity within AAPL must be addressed on individual and structural levels. Identifying the circumstances that disadvantage women and all underrepresented groups will only make AAPL a stronger organization, better situated to offer the benefits of membership to all its members.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2020 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Wall BW,
    2. Aoun EG
    : Diversity and inclusion within AAPL. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 47:274–7, 2019
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Frank E,
    2. Zhao Z,
    3. Sen S,
    4. Guille C
    : Gender disparities in work and parental status among early career physicians. JAMA Network Open 2:e198340, 2019
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.↵
    1. Mangurian C,
    2. Linos E,
    3. Sarkar U,
    4. et al
    : What's holding women in medicine back from leadership. Harvard Business Review. June 19, 2018. Available at: https://hbr.org/2018/06/whats-holding-women-in-medicine-back-from-leadership. Accessed October 6, 2019
  4. 4.↵
    1. Johnson PA,
    2. Widnall SE,
    3. Benya FF
    National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine: Sexual Harassment of Women: Climate, Culture, and Consequences in Academic Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Edited by Johnson PA, Widnall SE, Benya FF. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2018
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 48 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 48, Issue 1
1 Mar 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
LETTERS
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
LETTERS
Liza Gold
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2020, 48 (1) 142; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003928-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
LETTERS
Liza Gold
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2020, 48 (1) 142; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003928-20
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Letters
  • Letters
  • Letters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law