Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
LetterLetters

Letters

Erik Roskes
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online September 2020, 48 (3) 426; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.200053-20
Erik Roskes
Baltimore, Maryland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  • stigma
  • narrative truth

Editor:

In their otherwise interesting review of The Silent Patient1, Drs. Friedman, Magalotti, and Bodnar express the concern that the novel stigmatizes forensic psychiatry by portraying clinicians treating a character as delusional, when his beliefs are later revealed to be based in reality.

In my two decades of practice, I have come across several patients who appeared psychotic on presentation who, after investigation, were found to have been accurately reporting personal historical events. In some cases, the patient was indeed psychotic, but parts of the story we called delusional were nonetheless true. As an example, when I was working at a state hospital in Maryland, we had a man admitted on a competency order who, during our workup, told us he was a bassist who played with various famous jazz musicians in the 1960s. Given his fairly severe psychosis and his obvious poverty and social disconnection, we initially concluded that he had grandiose delusions. Our social worker determined that his story was true. Once we realized he was who he said he was, we were able to join forces with community providers and his supporters to engage him in community-based care and to help him resume, in his twilight years, his musical career. Before he died, he was public about his story, including his struggles with mental illness and addiction.2

In other cases, the patient was not psychotic at all, but the story appeared so outlandish given the circumstances that the treating or evaluating physicians wrongly concluded that the patient was delusional. One case involved a man who was jailed for minor nuisance charges. He came to the country as a refugee in the 1970s. He told jail clinicians that he made a living by playing chess in a public park, and that his story had been told in a documentary. Staff documented him to be “extremely delusional, guarded, evasive, paranoid, and grandiose,” despite showing no signs of psychosis other than his presumed delusion. He was quickly diagnosed with a psychotic disorder. Even when he provided ways for the treating staff to confirm his story, they did not do so. Given the unique details of his story, it only took a few moments with an online search engine to fully substantiate his story, yet he was documented to be refusing treatment for an illness he did not have. After two months in jail, he was released with time served.

These are just two examples of cases in which patients' stories at first appeared incredible yet were true, and in which we wrongly concluded they were delusional. Forensic psychiatrists are primed to examine the differences between people's narrative truth and objectively determined historical truth. We name those differences reality distortions. But sometimes the narrative truth is in fact the historical truth, and we should always be attuned to such a possibility. In diagnosing psychosis where there is none, we are the authors of our own stigma, and, even worse, we harm the people who are under our care or who are subject to our evaluations.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2020 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Freidman SH,
    2. Magalotti S,
    3. Bodnar T
    : Forensic psychiatry and The Silent Patient. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 48:285–7, 2020
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Russonello G
    : Butch Warren: To Hell & Back. After a life of struggle, the D.C. bass great pulls no punches. JazzTimes. April 26, 2019. Available at: https://jazztimes.com/features/profiles/butch-warren-to-hell-back. Accessed July 3, 2020
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 48 (3)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 48, Issue 3
1 Sep 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Letters
Erik Roskes
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2020, 48 (3) 426; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200053-20

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Letters
Erik Roskes
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Sep 2020, 48 (3) 426; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.200053-20
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Letters
  • Letters
  • Letters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • stigma
  • narrative truth

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law