Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherLegal Digest

Bounds of Expert Testimony in Relation to Insanity Defense

Nicole Lentini, Danielle Rynczak and Nathan Frommer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2024, 52 (4) 506-508; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240094-24
Nicole Lentini
Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danielle Rynczak
Adjunct Assistant ProfessorForensic PsychiatryPsychiatry & Behavioral SciencesNorthwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicago, Illinois
JD, PsyD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathan Frommer
Assistant General CounselMassachusetts Department of Mental HealthBoston, Massachusetts
JD, LLM
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 52 no. 4 506-508
DOI 
https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240094-24

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online December 12, 2024.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2024 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Nicole Lentini, MD
  1. Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry
  1. Danielle Rynczak, JD, PsyD
  1. Adjunct Assistant Professor

    Forensic Psychiatry
    Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences
    Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
    Chicago, Illinois
  1. Nathan Frommer, JD, LLM
  1. Assistant General Counsel
    Massachusetts Department of Mental Health
    Boston, Massachusetts

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 52 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 52, Issue 4
1 Dec 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Bounds of Expert Testimony in Relation to Insanity Defense
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Bounds of Expert Testimony in Relation to Insanity Defense
Nicole Lentini, Danielle Rynczak, Nathan Frommer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2024, 52 (4) 506-508; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.240094-24

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Bounds of Expert Testimony in Relation to Insanity Defense
Nicole Lentini, Danielle Rynczak, Nathan Frommer
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2024, 52 (4) 506-508; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.240094-24
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Trial Court Erroneously Struck Portions of Psychiatric Testimony Key to Defendant’s Insanity Defense
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Addressing Mental States in Expert Witness Testimony
  • Excessive Force in Involuntary Mental Health Examination
  • Medical Malpractice and Ordinary Negligence Cases Share Same Standard for Causation
Show more Legal Digest

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • expert testimony
  • expert witnesses
  • insanity
  • extreme mental or emotional disturbance
  • jury instructions

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law