Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
  • Log out
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
LetterLetters

Letters

Anthony Tamburello
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online January 2012, 40 (1) 156;
Anthony Tamburello
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Editor:

In my reading of the otherwise well-written commentary about the article on a case of psychotic denial of pregnancy in The Journal in 2011, I took exception to Dr. Powsner's discussion of delusional disorder.1 Setting aside that delusional disorder is easily ruled out in this case, given the bizarre nature of the symptoms presented, I was more concerned by the suggestion that delusional disorder was “much less responsive to pharmacologic management [than schizophrenia] and casts doubt on a recommendation for inpatient psychiatric stabilization” (Ref. 1, p 42). Dr. Powsner provided no reference to support either claim.

Delusional disorder is difficult to study, because affected persons often do not experience distress related to their fixed, false beliefs; they may not experience impairment if their beliefs are not acted on in a way that draws attention; and they usually lack the insight to seek treatment.2 Munro3 suggested that an 80 percent success rate from pimozide can be estimated when the existing case reports are considered in aggregate. Of great interest to this subject was the review by Herbel and Stelmach4 of 22 forensically hospitalized defendants with a diagnosis of delusional disorder, who were adjudicated incompetent to stand trial, of which 17 (77%) were restored to competency with forced medication. These results, while certainly requiring further validation, hardly contrast with the findings of the PORT study of over 100 trials of antipsychotic medications other than clozapine which cited a 50 to 80 percent improvement of patients with schizophrenia.5

Persons with delusional disorder, especially erotomanic, persecutory, jealous, and grandiose types, may engage in criminal behavior (e.g., stalking, assault, or murder) in response to their beliefs. Based on clinical experience (mine and that of colleagues) in correctional facilities and a maximum-security forensic hospital, I think that delusional disorder does concentrate in these settings. I encourage further investigation of this disorder, which should be of special interest to forensic psychiatrists.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2012 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Powsner S
    : Commentary: a curious conception. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 39:40–3, 2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    1. Nau M,
    2. Bender HE,
    3. Street J
    : Psychotic denial of pregnancy: legal and treatment considerations for clinicians. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 39:31–9, 2011
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Munro A
    : Delusional Disorder: Paranoia and Related Illness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999
  4. 4.↵
    1. Herbel BL,
    2. Stelmach H
    : Involuntary medication treatment for competency restoration of 22 defendants with delusional disorder. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 35:47–59, 2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Lehman AF,
    2. Steinwachs DM
    , and the co-investigators of the PORT project: At issue: translating research into practice—the schizophrenia patient outcomes research team (PORT) treatment recommendations. Schizophrenia Bull 241:1–10, 1998
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 40 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 40, Issue 1
1 Jan 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Letters
Anthony Tamburello
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jan 2012, 40 (1) 156;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Letters
Anthony Tamburello
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jan 2012, 40 (1) 156;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Editor:
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Letters
  • Letters
  • Letters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law