Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleRegular Article

Competency Restoration Treatment: Differences Between Defendants Declared Competent or Incompetent to Stand Trial

Claire D. Advokat, Devan Guidry, Darla M. R. Burnett, Gina Manguno-Mire and John W. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online January 2012, 40 (1) 89-97;
Claire D. Advokat
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Devan Guidry
MA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Darla M. R. Burnett
PhD, MP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gina Manguno-Mire
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Thompson Jr
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 40 no. 1 89-97
PubMed 
22396346

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online March 6, 2012.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2012 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Claire D. Advokat, PhD,
  2. Devan Guidry, MA,
  3. Darla M. R. Burnett, PhD, MP,
  4. Gina Manguno-Mire, PhD and
  5. John W. Thompson Jr, MD
  1. Dr. Advokat is Professor of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA; Ms. Guidry is a medical student at the Health Sciences Center-LSU Medical School, New Orleans, LA. Dr. Burnett is Staff Psychologist at the Eastern Louisiana Mental Health System-Forensic Division, Jackson, LA. Dr. Manguno-Mire is Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and Dr. Thompson is Vice Chairman, Adult Psychiatry, and Director, Forensic Neuropsychiatry, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA.
  1. Address correspondence to: Claire D. Advokat, PhD, Department of Psychology, 236 Audubon Hall, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. E-mail: cadvoka{at}lsu.edu.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 40 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 40, Issue 1
1 Jan 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Competency Restoration Treatment: Differences Between Defendants Declared Competent or Incompetent to Stand Trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Competency Restoration Treatment: Differences Between Defendants Declared Competent or Incompetent to Stand Trial
Claire D. Advokat, Devan Guidry, Darla M. R. Burnett, Gina Manguno-Mire, John W. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jan 2012, 40 (1) 89-97;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Competency Restoration Treatment: Differences Between Defendants Declared Competent or Incompetent to Stand Trial
Claire D. Advokat, Devan Guidry, Darla M. R. Burnett, Gina Manguno-Mire, John W. Thompson
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Jan 2012, 40 (1) 89-97;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • A Forensic Science-Based Model for Identifying and Mitigating Forensic Mental Health Expert Biases
  • Bias in Peer Review of Forensic Psychiatry Publications
  • Reconsidering the Relationship Between Criminal Insanity and Delusions
Show more Regular Article

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law