Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
OtherLegal Digest

Exclusion of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Substance Use in Consideration of Death Penalty Case Appeal

Aliana Abascal, Cheryl Hill and Kari-Beth Law
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online March 2018, 46 (1) 122-124;
Aliana Abascal
Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheryl Hill
Associate Professor of Psychiatry
MD, PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kari-Beth Law
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 46 no. 1 122-124

Published By 
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Print ISSN 
1093-6793
History 
  • Published online April 4, 2018.

Copyright & Usage 
© 2018 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Author Information

  1. Aliana Abascal, MD
  1. Fellow in Forensic Psychiatry
  1. Cheryl Hill, MD, PhD
  1. Associate Professor of Psychiatry
  1. Kari-Beth Law, MD
  1. Assistant Professor of Psychiatry
  2. Department of Behavioral Medicine and Psychiatry
    West Virginia University
    Morgantown, WV

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 46 (1)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 46, Issue 1
1 Mar 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Exclusion of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Substance Use in Consideration of Death Penalty Case Appeal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Exclusion of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Substance Use in Consideration of Death Penalty Case Appeal
Aliana Abascal, Cheryl Hill, Kari-Beth Law
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2018, 46 (1) 122-124;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Exclusion of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Substance Use in Consideration of Death Penalty Case Appeal
Aliana Abascal, Cheryl Hill, Kari-Beth Law
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Mar 2018, 46 (1) 122-124;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Failure to Present Evidence of Mental Illness or Substance Use Did Not Represent Ineffective Counsel and Therefore Was Not Grounds for Granting Certificate of Appealability
    • Footnotes
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Addressing Mental States in Expert Witness Testimony
  • Excessive Force in Involuntary Mental Health Examination
  • Medical Malpractice and Ordinary Negligence Cases Share Same Standard for Causation
Show more Legal Digest

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law