Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
LetterLetters

Letters

Scott E. Kirkorsky, Wanda Shao and Joseph D. Bloom
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2019, 47 (4) 538; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.003906-19
Scott E. Kirkorsky
Phoenix, Arizona
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wanda Shao
Atlanta, Georgia
DO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph D. Bloom
Phoenix, Arizona
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Editor:

We write to correct an oversight in our recently published paper regarding Arizona's procedures following a verdict of guilty except insane (GEI).1 The thesis of our paper is that Arizona's GEI verdict, as modified in 2007, is consistent with a guilty but mentally ill (GBMI) verdict in that individuals adjudicated GEI for charges involving death or serious physical injury are incarcerated in the state department of corrections and are placed under the jurisdiction of the Arizona Psychiatric Security Review Board (AzPSRB) for the full term of their institutionalization or conditional release. The statute also provides a mechanism for the AzPSRB to transfer individuals adjudicated GEI for less serious offenses from the state hospital to the department of corrections when they no longer require hospital care but remain dangerous and likely to reoffend.

We have learned from representatives of the Board that this is not always the case. There is a small subset of individuals under AzPSRB jurisdiction who are not subject to transfer to a correctional facility even if the AzPSRB determines that the individual no longer needs treatment in the hospital but remains dangerous or at risk to reoffend.

Whether or not individuals are subject to transfer to a correctional facility is based on the specific statute under which they are sentenced. Based on our understanding of the legislative intent of the 2007 changes to Arizona's GEI verdict, we believe that excluding some individuals from transfer to corrections may have been an oversight. Preliminary discussions with individuals affiliated with the AzPSRB and the Arizona State Hospital indicate that excluding individuals from transfer to a correctional facility is problematic for both parties.

Stakeholders have suggested petitioning the legislature to change the statute to empower the AzPSRB to transfer to corrections any individual under its jurisdiction, consistent with the legislative intent of the 2007 statutory changes. Other proposed solutions include educating judges on the ramifications of sentencing individuals found GEI under the statutes that do not permit transfer to corrections.

We bring this statutory inconsistency to the attention of your readers and hope to follow this situation closely as actions are taken to clarify the situation.

Footnotes

  • Disclosures of financial or other potential conflicts of interest: None.

  • © 2019 American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Reference

  1. 1.↵
    1. Kirkorsky SE,
    2. Shao W,
    3. Bloom JD
    : The migration of Arizona's post-insanity defense procedures to a modified GBMI model. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 47:217–23, 2019
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 47 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 47, Issue 4
1 Dec 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Letters
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Letters
Scott E. Kirkorsky, Wanda Shao, Joseph D. Bloom
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2019, 47 (4) 538; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003906-19

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Letters
Scott E. Kirkorsky, Wanda Shao, Joseph D. Bloom
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2019, 47 (4) 538; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.003906-19
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Editor:
    • Footnotes
    • Reference
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Letters
  • Letters
  • Letters
Show more Letters

Similar Articles

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law