Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • AAPL

User menu

  • Alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
  • AAPL
  • Alerts
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Past Issues
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Print Subscriptions
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • About the Academy
    • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
Research ArticleAnalysis and Commentary

Victim Intoxication and Capacity to Consent in Sexual Assault Statutes across the United States

Peter J. Teravskis, Rebecca Grossman-Kahn and Chinmoy Gulrajani
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online December 2022, 50 (4) 600-610; DOI: https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.220032-21
Peter J. Teravskis
Dr. Teravskis is a psychiatry resident at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. Dr. Grossman-Kahn is a resident at University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Minneapolis, MN. Dr. Gulrajani is Associate Professor of Psychiatry at University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Minneapolis, MN.
JD, MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Grossman-Kahn
Dr. Teravskis is a psychiatry resident at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. Dr. Grossman-Kahn is a resident at University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Minneapolis, MN. Dr. Gulrajani is Associate Professor of Psychiatry at University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Minneapolis, MN.
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chinmoy Gulrajani
Dr. Teravskis is a psychiatry resident at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL. Dr. Grossman-Kahn is a resident at University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Minneapolis, MN. Dr. Gulrajani is Associate Professor of Psychiatry at University of Minnesota, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Minneapolis, MN.
MBBS
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Materials
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Plain language categorization of United States felony criminal sexual conduct statutes based on definitions of victim incapacity to consent due to voluntary or involuntary intoxication.

    (A) Map demonstrating four categories of felony criminal statutes relating to victim impairment or incapacity to consent to sexual contact or intercourse. Black denotes state statutes that only consider victims to be impaired or incapacitated if they are involuntarily intoxicated. Gray indicates states and the District of Columbia that consider a victim to be incapable of consent because of either voluntary or involuntary intoxication. White illustrates states that either have no statutory text relating to mental impairment or incapacity or do not include a statutory definition of mental incapacity. Finally, diagonal stripes show that Minnesota amended its definition of mental incapacity to include victims who are both involuntarily and voluntarily intoxicated. Classification based on plain language analysis is reproduced in Appendix A online. (B) Pie chart illustrating the number of jurisdictions falling into each of the categories listed in (A). Note that state courts may construe similarly worded statutes differently regardless of their plain meaning as illustrated here.52,53 Figure constructed using JMP Pro 16, SAS Institute Inc. (Cary, North Carolina) and Affinity Designer, Sarif (Europe) Ltd. (West Bridgford, United Kingdom).

Tables

  • Figures
  • Supplementary Materials
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Statutory Language Used to Describe the Effects of Intoxication on Victims of Sexual Offenses (citations listed in Appendix A online)

    JurisdictionIntoxication IncludedOperative LanguageJurisdictionIntoxication IncludedOperative Language
    AlabamaYesIncapacitated
    Incapable
    MontanaNoMentally disordered or incapacitated
    AlaskaNoIncapacitated
    Incapable
    NebraskaNoMentally or physically incapable
    ArizonaYesIncapable
    Impairment
    NevadaNoMentally or physically incapable
    ArkansasYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    New HampshireYesMentally incapacitates
    CaliforniaYesPreventedNew JerseyYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    ColoradoYesIncapable
    Impaired
    New MexicoN/AN/A
    ConnecticutYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    New YorkYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    DelawareYesImpairedNorth CarolinaNoMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    District of ColumbiaYesImpairs
    Incapable
    North DakotaYesImpaired
    FloridaYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    OhioYesImpairs
    GeorgiaN/AN/AOklahomaYesAdministered
    HawaiiYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    OregonNoMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    IdahoYesUnablePennsylvaniaYesImpaired
    IllinoisYesUnable
    Delivers
    Rhode IslandYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    IndianaYesFurnishingSouth CarolinaYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    IowaYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    South DakotaYesIncapable
    KansasYesIncapableTennesseeYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    KentuckyYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    TexasYesImpaired
    LouisianaYesIncapableUtahYesImpaired
    MaineYesImpairedVermontYesImpair
    MarylandYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    VirginiaNoMental incapacity
    Prevents
    MassachusettsN/AN/AWashingtonYesMental incapacity
    Prevents
    MichiganYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    West VirginiaYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    MinnesotaYesMentally incapacitatedWisconsinYesIncapable
    MississippiYesMentally incapacitated
    Incapable
    WyomingYesImpairs
    MissouriYesImpaired
    • View popup
    Table 2

    States That Do Not Explicitly Define Intoxication as a Reason a Victim May Lack Capacity to Consent to Sexual Contact or Intercourse

    StateStatutePertinent Language
    AlaskaAlaska Stat. § 11.41.470(2) (2021)“‘[I]ncapacitated' means temporarily incapable of appraising the nature of one’s own conduct or physically unable to express unwillingness to act”
    MontanaMont. Code Ann. § 45-5-501(b)(i) (2019)No statutory definition of “mentally … incapacitated”
    NebraskaNeb. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 28-319 & -320 (2015)No statutory definition of “mentally … incapable”
    NevadaNev. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 200.366 (2021)No statutory definition of “mentally … incapable”
    North CarolinaN.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-27.20(2) (2019)“Mentally incapacitated.– A victim who due to any act is rendered substantially incapable of either appraising the nature of his or her conduct, or resisting the act of vaginal intercourse or a sexual act”
    OregonOr. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 163.305(3) (2021)“‘Mentally incapacitated' means that a person is rendered incapable of appraising or controlling the conduct of the person at the time of the alleged offense”
    VirginiaVa. Code Ann. § 18.2-67.10(3) (2004)‘“Mental incapacity' means that condition of the complaining witness existing at the time of an offense under this article which prevents the complaining witness from understanding the nature or consequences of the sexual act involved in such offense and about which the accused knew or should have known”
    • View popup
    Table 3

    Examples of States Requiring a Higher Degree of Intoxication Where Victims of Sexual Offenses Are Voluntarily Intoxicated Compared to Victims Who Are Involuntarily Intoxicated

    StateStatutesRequired Condition Due to Voluntary IntoxicationRequired Condition Due to Involuntary Intoxication
    ArkansasArk. Code Ann. § 5-14-101(6) (2021)“That renders the person unaware a sexual act is occurring”“[T]emporarily incapable of appreciating or controlling the person’s conduct”
    ColoradoColo. Rev. Stat. § 18-3-402(1)(b), (4)(d); § 18-3-404(1)(b), (1)(d) (2022)“[T]he victim is incapable of appraising the nature of the victim’s conduct”“The actor has substantially impaired the victim’s power to appraise or control the victim’s conduct”
    Rhode IslandR.I. Gen. Laws § 11-37-1(5) (1999)“[I]s mentally unable to communicate unwillingness to an act”“[I]ncapable of appraising or controlling his or her conduct”
    • View popup
    Table 4

    Examples of Jurisdictions in Which Sexual Offenses Involving Involuntary Intoxication of the Victim Carry a Greater Penalty Than Cases in Which the Victim is Voluntarily Intoxicated

    JurisdictionInvoluntary Intoxication OffenseStatuteVoluntary Intoxication OffenseStatute
    District of ColumbiaFirst degree sexual abuseD.C. Code § 22-3002 (2013)Second degree sexual abuseD.C. Code § 22-3003 (2013)
    IllinoisAggravated criminal sexual assault720 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/11-1.20 (2016)Criminal sexual assault720 Ill. Comp Stat. Ann. 5/11-1.20 (2016)
    LouisianaSecond degree rapeLa. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:42.1 (2020)Third degree rapeLa. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 14:43 (2015)
    OhioRapeOhio Rev. Code Ann. § 2907.02 (2021)Sexual batteryOhio Rev. Code Ann. § 2907.03 (2019)
    South CarolinaCriminal sexual conduct in the first degreeS.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-652 (2010)Criminal sexual conduct in the third degreeS.C. Code Ann. § 16-3-654 (1977)

Supplementary Materials

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Supplementary data

    Download PDF

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online: 50 (4)
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online
Vol. 50, Issue 4
1 Dec 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in recommending The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law site.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Victim Intoxication and Capacity to Consent in Sexual Assault Statutes across the United States
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Victim Intoxication and Capacity to Consent in Sexual Assault Statutes across the United States
Peter J. Teravskis, Rebecca Grossman-Kahn, Chinmoy Gulrajani
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2022, 50 (4) 600-610; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.220032-21

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Victim Intoxication and Capacity to Consent in Sexual Assault Statutes across the United States
Peter J. Teravskis, Rebecca Grossman-Kahn, Chinmoy Gulrajani
Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online Dec 2022, 50 (4) 600-610; DOI: 10.29158/JAAPL.220032-21
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • State v. Khalil (Minn. 2021)
    • Fifty-One Jurisdiction Statutory Review
    • Statutory Reform in Minnesota following Khalil
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Toward Aspirational Forensic Mental Health Practice
  • Ethics Challenges in Correctional Mental Health
  • Methamphetamine-Associated Psychosis and Criminal Responsibility
Show more Analysis and Commentary

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • capacity
  • consent
  • criminal law
  • criminal responsibility
  • intoxication
  • sexual assault

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Ahead of Print
  • Archive
  • Information for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Board
  • Feedback
  • Alerts

Other Resources

  • Academy Website
  • AAPL Meetings
  • AAPL Annual Review Course

Reviewers

  • Peer Reviewers

Other Publications

  • AAPL Practice Guidelines
  • AAPL Newsletter
  • AAPL Ethics Guidelines
  • AAPL Amicus Briefs
  • Landmark Cases

Customer Service

  • Cookie Policy
  • Reprints and Permissions
  • Order Physical Copy

Copyright © 2025 by The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law